Okay, so I am not exactly panicking but I have always had a
flair for the dramatic and a need for attention.
Just ask my family who spent many a day watching me in plays
or at dance recitals. Till this day any
time I look back on my times as a tiny dancer I can see my brother sitting in
the audience playing his game boy until it is my class' turn to dance. That is
when mom would tell him to pause the game and for the 3-5 minutes I was on
stage he patiently watched his younger sister perform. Or there were the times that I would pester
my mom to “look at me” and then jump and turn in a circle. That’s it. Just jump
and turn. Jump and turn. I might add arms and say, “number 1, number 2” depend
on where my arms were placed. Man my mom
loves me.
But enough memory lane for now. My current drama queen panic is it has been a
month and a half since starting this crazy PhD. thing and I still have no idea
what I want to write my dissertation on.
Well I have an idea but I don’t know if it is good. I know in its
current form it isn’t narrow enough but I don’t know if I should even bother
narrowing it down or just scrap it and start over. If I tell you what it
is do you promise not to laugh? Pinky
swear?
I want to look at the character actress. I want to look at
the actress that doesn’t play the sweet ingĂ©nue role, that isn’t allowed to
perform as herself because she isn’t Hollywood’s standard of beauty. Often
these women are comedians or play mostly comic roles. They are the supporting
actresses or the best friends to the Julia Robertses, or the Catherine Zeta
Jonses of the film industry. Think Rebel
Wilson, Melissa McCarthy, Carol Burnett, etc.
I find the work that these women put into these roles
fascinating because it is so very visible to an audience. A majority of the roles offered to and
performed by leading ladies are roles that on the surface don’t require a lot
of intense characterization. For
example, think about Julia Roberts in Notting
Hill, Ocean’s 11, Mona Lisa’s Smile, and Pretty Woman. To my young scholars eye, there is not a lot
of change in Ms. Robert’s acting. Costuming
and dialogue help tremendously in creating a character but the level of work
put into the characterization is pretty much unchanged.
Contrastingly, Melissa McCarthy’s work is drastically
different from project to project. If
you compare her work on Gilmour Girls
to Bridesmaids to her new film Identity Thief you see a different
person on screen. A different character, a different person is present.
Now I will put a disclaimer up and say that there are
exceptions to every rule blah blah blah.
But just humor me till the end of this post.
So as John would put it, So what and why now? Well I think so what because the 20th
and 21st centuries are not the only times when character actresses
are present. There is a history in
theatre, film and television that should be marked I think. I answer the why now with, these women are physically and mentally
laboring in a much more noticeable way but are not receiving institutional
recognition from the different awards groups. Historically, comedy has been the crowd pleaser
but drama is what wins the awards. Audiences appreciate the work these
character actresses do but the performance industries do not recognize it as
work.
Anyway that is what I got. Is it a dissertation? Can it be a book? I don’t know that I have the answer two those
questions yet but I still got time right?
Feeling less panicked.
Evleen
My (layman's) $0.02:
ReplyDeleteI would totally read a dissertation/book about pretty much any permutation on that subject. If there's actually historical material on that to be researched, I think it could be fascinating. That being said, my (relative to yours) very limited research-paper-writing experience tells me that you're absolutely right about it having to be narrowed, and I think that the direction that you choose to narrow it could have wildly varying effects on its strength as a topic.
...which you know, so I'm just blathering on for nothing. Though I am subscribing to your blog now. :-P