Warning! This blog post is a free writing exercise that has
not been edited for form. If you like unruly blog posts concerned with the
thoughts of a scholar in struggle then continue reading. If you
don’t then press the little x on your browser window and walk away.
Right now I am in the midst of writing a play for my drama
writing class and a conference paper for ASTR.
Writing the play is on the surface a pretty easy task except
for that whole ending thing, but meh?
As for the conference paper… well, let’s just say it’s a
little rougher. In the past I have often had to talk out my thesis so
that I make sure I understand it. I feel for the poor victim volunteer
who sits and listens to me blather on until my brain figures out how to form
words into meaningful sentences but it is quite helpful. During my MA that
person was Emily. These
argument-clarifying discussions often took place going to, sitting in, or,
leaving from the bathroom. We both know that when a restroom is involved we do our best thinking. Since getting to
Baton Rouge I haven’t yet needed that person to help me clarify my brain
rambles but here I am and here you are so lets break it down.
I am writing about this internet archive called
sweetheartsofrhythm.org and the vintage dance groups it features. This website
identifies itself as an archive of photos and videos of lindy-hop and jazz
dance performances. The media included
on the website is both new media and “vintage” film and photos. According to
the website, it is the go to place for all female dance groups or women who
want to learn more about what I am calling “vintage dance.” This website also
links to other individual websites of
all female vintage dance groups.
These sites are where you can see photos and videos of that groups work
as well as get in contact with them to book them for performances.
After looking at all of the different sites and doing some
thinking, I came to the conclusion that when these women perform their vintage
dances it is very unlikely they are performing them for an audience that have
memories tied to “original” performances of those dances. What I think most likely is happening is that
the audiences memories of these vintage dance performances come from film and
television. This became clearer to me
when I looked at a 2009 video of the dance group ATOMIC Cherry Bombs. The performance in the video is a recreation
of the “All I Do is Dream of You” song
and dance sequence in the film version of Singin’
In The Rain. I have included the videos below.
Singin' In The Rain
See?
What gets really interesting is that the original
performance in Singin’ In The Rain is
actually not a contemporary performance of vintage dance. The film was produced in the early 1950 but
set in the late 1920s. Thus, the 2009 performance is a re-recreation of an
original dance style from 1927. (Humanities
scholars very own logic problem.) Now, some of the photo and video resources on the sweethearts of rhythm website look to be from the correct time period of these vintage dances but I guess what I am wondering is what does it mean to the history of the dances that they are being recreated from these films contemporary or not. And does it really matter to the audiences of these performances if they are from primary sources?
Now my problem isn’t a lack of theorists to help support my
argument. Joseph Roach, Diana Taylor and Judith Butler will all be very
helpful. I might even throw in some Walter Benjamin or Adorno for funsies. My
problem is that I have an argument that I think is really great but I am
currently lacking the way to phrase it.
All female vintage dance groups are embodying memories of
and nostalgia for a past that exists only in period films and television. Is that it?
Is that my thesis statement for this paper? Does that make sense to anyone else besides
me?
*headdesk
Evleen
Makes PERFECT sense to me.
ReplyDeleteFascinating stuff, Evleen. This is a very rich trove of Stuff To Research. I would encourage you to sit in on a History of Dance class and start making yourself our resident expert in dance history/theory.
ReplyDeleteThe question about argument you bring up is vital; kudos to you for pinpointing it. It's really two questions: "So what?" and "Why now?" What needs to be said about these--what are they? acts of re-membering? border-crossings between archive and repertoire?--events? What RIGHT NOW needs to be said? Why this particular investigation/intervention right now? What's at stake here?
So your next job is to step a bit back from Grand Theory and seek out some sibling scholars doing work on dance. What's the extant conversation about vintage dances? There is a conversation, I'm sure. But what is it? What questions are they asking? What theorists are they using? Sink yourself into some other dance historians. See what they're saying. Note when you get annoyed at what those other dance historians AREN'T saying or asking or what they just ASSUME rather than interrogate. These points of discomfort/annoyance are your entry point. They're the "...but I say" to the "They say..."
This is an exciting, growing field, Evleen, and I'm eager to see what more you do with this (perhaps for your second week in 7913?)
Best,
John